All posts by Richard

Popular Science and Mechanics … Technology History

Google Book Search just brought online a fantastic feature which allows one to browse at no cost back issues of popular magazines (read announcement). Given this blog's focus on engineering and technology, what better way to explore this cool new feature than by looking at history via the eyes of Popular Science and Popular Mechanics? My search methodology would work for any other magazine! Click upon either of the two images for an expanded view. The images annotate /explain the search process.

My search query results return the cover images for the relevant year. One then just clicks upon any image to browse / read all the articles within that issue. Super Cool !!! This post will be linked via the Engineering Learning Wiki. For the moment, I'll link it is the manuals section of the wiki.

For my purposes I've chosen to do the following searches:

Popular-Science-Query

.
Popular-Science-Results
 

Yammering Together

From the NY Times: For Innovators, There Is Brainpower in Numbers:

“The best innovations occur when you have networks of people with
diverse backgrounds gathering around a problem,” says Robert Fishkin,
president and chief executive of Reframeit Inc., a Web 2.0 company that
creates virtual space in a Web browser where users can share comments
and highlights on any site. “We need to get better at collaborating in
noncompetitive ways across company and organizational lines.”

How did I learn of this article? Yammer! A colleague at my company posted some information about the innovation process. Here are my comments about this kind of tool … essentially Twitter for the corporation:

  • My first impression of Yammer … what a waste!
  • My second impression … boy was I stupid!
  • Yammer introduces the unknown to me … valuable people and ideas in my company

Let me expand. My expectation was that listening to folks … even my colleagues post small messages a la Twitter would be a distraction, and a waste of my time. Instead I discovered:

  • Via Yammer I joined groups that pertained to my job
  • People from my groups who I DID NOT originally know provided me valuable knowledge

In summation, it's easy to talk to the folks you know. It's easy to seek ideas from your known peers. The big question … how do you discover knowledge hidden to you within your own organization? My company has over 120,000 employees. So far, I don't know everyone. Yammer helps me expand my knowledge base. Thus, this experiment is worth continuing.

Finally, link to my Minnesota Yammer colleague … and watch his overview on how to update your Yammer profile (via Slideshare).

07unbox.xlarge1

Nerd Weather Forecast!

Where do you get your weather forecast! A few minutes ago, when I clicked upon details via iGoogle for Minneapolis, I discovered the current conditions were from my own research center!  I knew some of the guys had a weather station on the roof, I just didn't know that it was linked to Google!  Cool. Take a look; click upon the image to view full sized.

Weather

It’s 10 pm … Where Is Your Metadata?

My job at large Fortune 100 company involves the optimization of web collaboration and knowledge sharing. One primary task I have is trying to help my users find relevant information on our intranet. Thus, it's 10 pm … where is your metadata?

Seriously, how many of you use standard corporate templates for Powerpoint or Word documents? Have you ever stopped to see what is contained in the document properties? or do you just re-save your work with a new file name? In that case, many of your files have exactly the same name as far as a search engine is concerned … such as <IBM Template> or <Motorola Template>. You get the idea. Imagine how hard it is for a dumb robot (i.e. the search engine) to determine what content is most relevant.

Search engines look primarily at two document elements, title and subject. Here is an excerpt from John Webb Consulting's overview on office metadata:

Title Field
Titles appear as the caption for documents in search results and give users an idea what the document is about. Titles are searchable and contribute greatly to search engine rankings.

  • Use the title as it appears in the document.
  • If you have to cut the title short, end the title with complete words, not in the middle of words.
  • Search engines will generally display the first 90 or so characters of the title, so make sure the first 90 characters contain the most meaningful and important information.

Subject Field (Summary)
Information in this field appears as the document summary in search results and can also help contribute to ranking in the search engine.

  • Include terms used in the document – this enhances the ranking in search results.
  • Summaries should not exceed 200 characters.
  • Keep it simple.
  • Make each description unique.

Ignore all the other document properties fields. If you follow this advice, what you create may actually be found on your intranet!

Research

Mad Scientists at Work

If you've never listened to the Science Ig Nobel Awards, you have never lived. Many techies dream of the Nobel Prize for their scientific work … for the rest of us there is Science Ig Nobel. Link to National Public Radio's podcast and find out! This is one of my favorite podcasts which I listen to each year.

IgNobels